Honestly not only is your man cheating, he is doing it with little girls and paying for it. Seriously you are the police, make his life hell and leave him. Make him go to jail and you get to keep everything. Why would you help his ass molest children and then destroy the pictures the fool took while he was molesting them.
His dumb ass:
Her dumb ass:
Cop's Husband Held by Feds
ATLANTA (AP) -- Federal authorities allege that the husband of an Atlanta police officer took photos of himself having sex with several young girls, and say the police department had some of the pictures seven years ago but took no action.
U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said, "This is a very disturbing case, for many reasons."
Terrill Crane was ordered today by a magistrate judge to be held in federal custody pending a detention hearing on December fifth. He faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted of producing child pornography.
Prosecutors say Crane's wife, Sergeant Tanya Crane, destroyed potential evidence, but she has not been charged. Department spokeswoman Judy Pal said Crane is on paid administrative leave from the police force. A phone listing for the couple in Georgia could not be located today.
Terrill Crane's attorney, Don Samuel, told The Associated Press after an initial court appearance for his client today that there are doubts about some of the allegations relating to how old the girls were. He also said that Crane's wife did not destroy any evidence.
Samuel said, "She was told there was some investigation and said, 'Let me know,' and nothing happened."
It's legal in Georgia to have consensual sex with someone under 16, but under federal law it is illegal to take pornographic photos of someone under the age of 18.
Federal prosecutors said that a photo shop employee contacted the Atlanta Police Department in 2000 because he was concerned about the content of film developed for Terrill Crane, and that photos were provided to police over the next two years.
(Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
10 comments:
Reading this post was hysterical! His dumb ass, her dumb ass...sorry. That was funny.
But yeah, for real...is the er, uh, penis THAT good? What happened to Justice, Girl?
It is true, they were both dumb asses if the allegations are true, and honestly sometimes it is ok to dog a man out, especially if he is doing things to children. ick.
If the penis is trying to diddle 12 year olds, the penis can't be all that good.
This is a horrible situation, and what are they planning on doing to the police station?
Furthermore, someone needs to address the issue of it being legal to have consensual sex with CHILDREN under the age of 16. Sure it's "consensual", but what determines consent? I believe that for it to be truly consensual, one must be at a level of maturity to understand both the emotional, psychological, and physical effects of having sex. This is just not the case for people who are even at the age 16, much less for those who are younger. Sadly, we cannot place an age on this. But more importantly, how do they determine when the CHILD is too young. I hate to bring up this story as it is a very sad one, but a man was recently arrested for raping/killing an infant. Is that too young? Okay, well what about a 5 year old?
Then again I have to wonder if this part of the story, "It's legal in Georgia to have consensual sex with someone under 16," is even true. Of course it brings to mind the Genarlow (sp?) Wilson case. If it were true, then that wouldn't have been an issue, right?
At any rate, I'm confused and disgusted.
I don't know what they do to the people at the police station. What scares me is the amount of protecting the police will do for their own kind, but not for the victims and the people they are supposed to serve. Look at the Peterson case in Illinois. He was married 4 times, one ends in murder, the other a woman has disappeared. Previous wives before that indicate police were called for domestic violence many times, but nothing was done. This guy managed to move up and retire while doing all this mess. Honestly it is scary that stuff like that happens.
In terms of what is too young. 16 is to young to make decisions to have sex with old ass men. Two 16 year olds I don't have a problem with, well I do, but it is much easier for me to swallow that than an old ass man looking for girls and offering them money for sex and taking pictures. Ick!!!!
And that does bring up a good point wasn't Genarlow Wilson's "victim" 15? Why was he in jail all that time?
I agree on the age thing. If there are two 16 year olds, then it's really up to them. In most cases, there isn't a big difference in terms of life experience, which in turn have a big influence on sexual relationships. But yeah, a 40 year old and a 16 year old is completely absurd. There's definitely more manipulation involved. The rule should be, if you were in junior high school when I was born.... hell no. Well, I'd give special passes to Johnny Depp, Hugh Jackman, and a couple of others. But that's just a personal opinion.
OK... I gonna play devils advocate here for just a small portion of this and say he is innocent until proven guilty. I know the odds are stacked against this guy, and if he's guilty may he burn in hell, weeping, gnashing teeth ect. ect. But the fact is we don't know. What I don't like is the fact that the media can run with the story. If I see this story then get selected to his jury how am I supposed to stay impartial. The way it looks, yea he's creep and probably did all of it and probably alot more and had his wife cover for him. This is only what he's been caught for. However the possibility remains he's innocent. Maybe he's a jerk to the film developer and developer decided to be " a concerned citizen " or maybe the developer is a racist and doesn't like the fact that he's married to a black woman, or even still maybe the film developer is radical christian and doesn't approve of the couples open life style and say's to himself that these girls "might" be a little young. (I notice that the actual age of the girls in the photos are left out of the article) Then you have a district attourney who's looking to make a name for himself... ok thats enough resonable doubt from me. Just for the record I think he's guilty
Back to reality. As far as the police are concerned, they definatly take care of there own. When a police is new to the force they tend to be bright eyed and still look at it as serving the people. Eventually they become disgruntled by the general slime of the public. Because the really good people out there generally don't break laws and don't have to deal with police daily. The police on the other hand always go to where they are called. This takes its toll and you tend to look at everyone same. My grandfather is a retired cheif of police and my uncle is a Lt. for the deputy sheriff's office and cousins are police officers. The mode of thinking end up going from protect and serve to "you may not be guilty of what I pulled you over for, but your guilty of something and I just havn't found out what it is yet." Police eventually resent the public they are paid to protect.
lanna I'm 28 and I still dont understand all the emotional, psychological, and physical effects of having sex
@ mr:
which is why i highly doubt a younger person would too. you might not understand all of it, but i'm sure you have a better understanding than a 10 year old (at least I hope so).
lanna
"i'm sure you have a better understanding than a 10 year old (at least I hope so)."
Why does every woman I know keep saying that LOL
Mr. You are right, the media does tend to run with things. The purpose of the media is no longer to report the facts, but rather sensationalize things. He could be innocent, I doubt it, but he could be.
Look at the Natalie Holloway case, they initially arrested the two black bodyguards as suspects, obviously they didn't have enough evidence, they were released. The majority of the media did nothing to apologize for plastering the faces of those two men all over the television.
Post a Comment