2009-10-20

The strengths of mixed-race relationships-It's Not All Doom and Gloom

As someone who is interracially married, I often get the questions of how do I cope. I am overtly aware of racism, and yes I acknowledge there are inequities based upon race in the society in which we live. I found this article discussing the viability of interracial relationships. It shows that despite how bad things can be, for the most part, they aren't all as bad as it is assumed to be.

Despite the inherent difficulties of mixing two cultures into one romantic union, some mixed-race couples actually have stronger relationships as a result of the unique experiences they endure, psychologists say.

Because they have to discuss and endure such painful realities as racism and conflict with extended family members and others, they may have an easier time negotiating the day-to-day struggles of any marriage.


Maybe the article has a point, if you are concerned with dealing with racists on a day to day basis an argument over who will do the dishes, isn't all that hard to deal with. Personally me and my husband don't talk race on a day to day basis, but it does come up at times.

Another thing to consider is the type of IR relationship, different types, elicit different responses and stereotypes:

Society, however, has a history of frowning upon cross-cultural marriage. Stereotypes regarding why people marry someone from a different race further complicate matters.

For example, black women who date white men can evoke powerful emotions based on historical perceptions.

'In slavery times, white men had black concubines who had no choice about participating in the relationship,' said Hall, a researcher who has studied interracial relationships for more than 15 years.

'People may assume he's with her for her sexual prowess or that he thinks owns her.'

When people see a black man with a white woman, they often believe he married her to move up the social strata, she said.

In Asian-American female-white male couples, people assume the husband is the dominant partner and the wife is compliant and docile, Kitano said.


There is also the belief that family reactions due to the race of one's partner can cause friction or issues within a relationship. My husband and I did not have this issue with his family, my family wasn't exactly crazy about my relationship, but they still gave him a chance, and actually like him. For others though, this isn't always the case.

A quote from the article I found interesting about the children of interracial marriages:

Families also argue that interracial couples are selfish for getting married because their children will have identity problems. Research indicates that interracial children are no less well-adjusted than other children of color, even though they face regular adolescent crises as well as racism.

But according to the results of a 1990 study conducted by Ana Mari Cause, PhD, and associates in Seattle, biracial children do just as well socially as ethnic-minority children.

In 1978 in Los Angeles, Hall interviewed 30 adults over age 18 to determine their adjustment to being biracial. Results revealed that most had high self-esteem and good adjustment in the majority of the participants.


All in all it seems the excuses as to why people should not get married or have children have been disproved and really have no real standing if we look at most studies done that give a more in depth look than personal perception.
If we are concerned about racism of biracial children, shouldn't we be concerned about all children of color? Asians, blacks, and hispanics constantly experience racism from childhood well into adulthood. Biracial children deal with racism from both sides, but so does a black kid who grew up in a predominantly white area and that does perceived "white things". I'm sure the same thing happens with asian or hispanic children in similar circumstances. We all know what the terms oreos, coconuts, and bananas mean when it comes to people of color.

12 comments:

Cynthia said...

I think alot of that stuff is bs. Sure, there may be some merit but it's nowhere set in stone.

I believe how you are raised plays a bigger role than your genetic make up.

I for one don't understand it. My ex was African and you would think we were in an interracial relationship from how his family reacted towards it. I think a lot of issues stem from outside sources and their perceived comfort level.

It takes two strong characters to stand up and buck what others deem as "normal" (what is normal, anyway?). I think it says a lot about you and your marriage and your kids will only benefit from that NOT have something taken away.

Mandie Reed said...

This site is so cool, love reading all the blog and postings, hope to chat with you soon... :)


Mandie Reed

TAB said...

This is my first time checking out your blog and I look forward to reading your other entries.

This post caught my eye because I am also in an IR/marriage. I had to comment because the anonymous quote about "people" thinking/wondering if white husbands/boyfriends believe they "own" their black wives/girlfriends got my attention.

Nobody has ever made any comment even close in nature to the quote above to my husband or me - and I live in an area where attitudes clearly reflect a lack of experience with diversity. I found the subtext of the quote not only racist but sexist: notably, "people" didn't apply that "belief" to the BM/WF IRs. At one time, black men too were enslaved...and had white owners who may very well have been women. Yet, "people" don't think/wonder if white women believe they own their black husbands/boyfriends. BTW, I'm *not* arguing that they should. I'm questioning the need to debase black women in a way that isn't applied to any other demographic. Slavery and sexual exoticism isn't raised in any of the other IR examples - compliant and docile (WM/AF example) is not synonymous with being "owned" (but it's still offensive).

Implicit in the "ownership" assumption is that black women (1) are inferior - and that's how *everyone*, including a white husband, sees them (there's no way it could be an equal relationship - based on skin color alone...right? lol) and (2) are inherently unattractive and there's no way that a non-black man could be with them other than sexual curiosity/gratification. I find it very telling when "people" jump to the most degrading assumptions possible about black women in IRs.

Yes, to a certain extent, we still grapple with the social legacies of the racism that allowed slavery to flourish...but sometimes it feels like some of us want all of us (yes, I'm black) to still be shackled. Why in the world should a black woman question whether a white guy is interested in her because he sees her as a slave/concubine? That's just sick.

Marianne said...

Having a loving and supportive family is the most important thing for a child. And a drop of luck, of course. There are well-adjusted children of all colors, just as there are messed-up children of all colors. People who try to discourage you, whether it's about IR marriage or transracial adoption, are just projecting their own insecurities on you, or are just plain jealous.
Look at how so many celebrity kids end up: they are born into privilege, have access to the best in life, and they still end up a mess. It's not worth shit if your parents don't love you.
It's no surprise that biracial children will have to face racism, but refusing to have them because of that is exactly what gives satisfaction to racists.
Family opposition brings huge drama in same-race couples as well, and sometimes even pushes them to divorce. I think it's a matter of luck to fall into a welcoming and accepting family, whatever the racial make-up of your couple.

Beyond The Political Spectrum said...

It's funny how skin is only 1/8th of an inch think, yet it's the hardest thing for the average person to get through.

Aabaakawad™ said...

I have heard it said, and it makes sense, that the difficulties of IR are great enuf at the beginning that it eliminates the weak relationships b4 marriage, thus the couples that follow thru are the strong and committed, so the have a better chance. Who knows.

Anonymous said...

I had to comment because the anonymous quote about "people" thinking/wondering if white husbands/boyfriends believe they "own" their black wives/girlfriends got my attention.
----

Why should anybody, in all honesty, think/wonder about such a thing in this day and age?!? The Slavery Era is too far removed from us and everyone from that time is as dead as a doornail. No, the whole slave & slaveholder line of BS is used mostly by AA men who want to keep AA women out of the WM's reach. That's why you never hear the BM/WW version of the story, even though there were PLENTY of white women who held black MEN, women and childen as slaves.

chimeziem said...

wow sid, you sure do get some prolific comments on your page, lol! interesting article. i must say, my favorite thing about your posts is how matter-of-fact you state your views. love it!

Anonymous said...

No, the whole slave & slaveholder line of BS is used mostly by AA men who want to keep AA women out of the WM's reach

According to Okay Cupid, it's pretty easy to keep WM away.

Anonymous said...

"No, the whole slave & slaveholder line of BS is used mostly by AA men who want to keep AA women out of the WM's reach

According to Okay Cupid, it's pretty easy to keep WM away."

Bm aren't exactly doing well in the dating world either, according to Ok Cupid. I sugguest you go back and take another look.

Anonymous said...

Bm aren't exactly doing well in the dating world either, according to Ok Cupid. I sugguest you go back and take another look.


You are right; however, I didn't mention black men.

Jasmin said...

This thread isn't about OKCupid, but in regards to the last 2 comments--the OKCupid study is bunk; I wouldn't take any of it's findings seriously. (I will elaborate if asked, but I don't want to derail the thread).